Posted on March 11, 2010.
Maybe the evil work, such as drawings by a sexy comic artist? Would God care if I draw a half-naked woman to practice on some of my drawings?
His art, art is beautiful! I do not see how this could be wrong. Personally, I think that art is art, naked or not. It's not like they are sleeping. Look at the Romans most of their art is done with men and women naked. All peoples may be different, but we are pretty much all the same. With clothes on equal look at how we are. Well at least for most. I have breasts and so no longer the Virgin on the face of this earth. True, some may be more or less, but they are always there like a penis Mans is there. Clothing even way back when you put in your place if you were wearing thin rich. No clothes, no worries. Plus you can not really feel the texture and the full body, through all the clothes that you cannot see anything other than the fabric.
Enjoy!
Read Romans 3 IN THE BIBLE ...
No art is an expression of appreciation and a certain subject. If you draw a naked woman, it is in the discretion of the perfect body is a woman.
Well, except how they bleed for a week ...
No.
Art can be controversial
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ
but never really bad.
No, he would not care.
If your God thought nudity is wrong, then why have we not born dressed?
Well, I'm sure someone in my class visual arts is religious. We have been drawing men and women naked one day per week for 8 months.
If you are religious, I do not see how this is important. The naked body is a beautiful thing, and it is for art, not a porn mag, right?
I assume that religious people to accept the study of the body as a gift from "god" can be wrong.
Ps: I do not see the drawings of life as sexy as the intention is to study the organization, not sexuality.
I'm an atheist, but raised Christian and you believe that "history" of the "creation", then you know that Adam and Eve were naked as long as the intention is not sexually then your religion should have no problems with it.
Although people who take naked are generally dealing with the human form and not an automatic thought of it in terms of adult ... then maybe you're just a pervert.
The human body is beautiful and deserves representation in art. This is because people are afraid of their bodies that something a little bare is considered "sexual". If you think about it, a naked woman doing something mediocre is not sexual, but a woman all dressed in a sexual pose. This is not the nudity that is the problem, it's shameful. Thank you for this religion.
As an artist and a Christian, I drew nudes. But I think we both know the difference between drawing the human body as a beautiful creation and drawing as a sex object. This is against the will of God if you believe the Bible.
The images have the power to corrupt.
Porn corrupts children and is as harmful as being molested.
Nicely done half naked people are not offensive. Sexy drawings are offensive to me and my children because I do not want some perv show them pictures like that, or showing real things like that.
If the game is half-naked soldiers "main", then you may want to get something else if you're worried about evil.
If there is a God, I do not think he would care that you're just improve your technique.